I recently watched a documentary called Peace,
Propaganda, and the Promised Land which highlights a great deal of injustice in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the imbalance in reporting on it.
Of course it's bogus to allow the U.S. media to ignore the history of the conflict and sanitize all the language to make us sound neutral, to make Israelis
sound familiarly human and westernized as though they only retaliate in self-defense, and to make the Palestinians all sound like stupid worthless animals and
hateful irrational terrorists. The media ignores the context horribly.
I think the whole conflict is a terrible problem with no simple solution. The relatively obvious answer seems to be to have Yisrael withdraw from the
occupied lands, relinquish the settlements, and grant Palestinians autonomy... restoring their dignity... but I can see that their brutal eradication of
Palestinians can be an overwhelmingly aggressive maneuver as a small component of a much larger defensive strategy. The massacres of civilians, human-rights
violations, and greedy motives are impossible to completely justify though. I don't believe that the ends always justify the means.
If Islamic extremists from all the surrounding areas and nations remain bent on complete extermination of Yisrael, then that provides a larger context for
Yisrael to want to control more of the territory nearby forcefully. I totally hate the murder on both sides and the systematic dehumanization of the
Palestinians in the United Statesian media and psyche. I wish the Palestinians could at least be relocated rather than murdered and molested. At best, I wish
both sides would stop aggression and Yisrael would withdraw from all occupation by abandoning their colonization through settlements. I can see that the
threat is on their doorstep but they have overwhelming military might and are habitually cruel in their conquest. Of course it's not all Israelis that are
this way or think the occupation is necessary for their protection. Lots are totally striving for peace too. The ongoing oppression by those who feel
justified in instigating, renewing, and escalating the violence just exacerbates the situation and is consistently horrendous.
I think the U.S. wants to dominate the area to take control of the oil and is using Yisrael's supposed defenses against terrorism as a pretext. This greed
is wicked and is the only thing that deserves to be murdered brutally. I hate it. I wish substantial progress towards peace could be made and that the
U.S. would stop blindly supporting Yisrael even when they are wrong.
In other news, I recently saw the movie, Proof, with Gwyneth Paltrow and Anthony Hopkins, for the first time. Please be warned that the following contains
spoilers.
Proof was a strong movie and I identified with Paltrow's character, Catherine, powerfully. I was brought to fitful tears several times by her moving
performance and how distressingly her situation resonated with my own memories, fears, and hopes. The dialog was generally smart and cutting. I thought the
ending was cheap though. It's like smart people are only really worthwhile or great if they "achieve" in some common way... like some breakthrough that will
bring fame and fortune. I don't think the average masses can be relied upon to ever properly recognize or appreciate greatness. They are, rather by
definition, undistinguished and undiscerning. They are generally wasteful and pompous and banal and couldn't know intellectual greatness if was in front of
their nose. They only worship the celebrity icons in movie stars as heroic but are fearful of the truly brilliant minds... or they're at least nonplussed
because smart people aren't usually so beautiful to look at and average people judge every book by its cover while claiming they do not and should not.
It vexed me to see a movie with such powerfully intellectual content (of course the mathematics still needed to be dumbed down somewhat to keep the
audience's attention) and it dealt with eminence, mental deterioration, insanity, dreams, obligations, expectations, loneliness, and many other issues so
wonderfully but then has this happy ending where she's going to become a celebrated and wealthy mathematician in her own right. On one hand, attaining
validation and accolades from her peers in the great math departments is totally happy and fine... but it was played up to this point where that success
seemed to become the only proof that she was great. I thought her character was great even without notoriety. I think smart people deserve to be recognized
as great... and we know it... but it's this weird situation where it's almost impossible for normal people to do it.
Take my presidential campaign here for example. I obviously want to lead people with honesty and integrity, courage and respect, a commitment to truth and
justice, solving problems, being fair, promoting freedom, autonomy, individuality, creativity, research, wisdom, and love. The average person is so afraid of
change that they expect (demand?) more lying politicians. Lies are considered just necessary "diplomacy" and "appeal" to accomplish the "greater good" through
governance. The masses do just want to mark their X in one of two boxes every four years and then dust off their hands in pride at their supposedly tremendous
accomplishment of their duty to uphold democracy. That is, if they even participate that much. They want to be deceived and ruled and think their optional
bit of contribution is sufficient. So dumb!
Anyway, I think smart people are of great value whether or not they are ever recognized and appreciated in any traditional, fiscal, or emotional way. I
think it's a great burden on all the gifted minds out there to only be measured by the metrics of the masses when their relatively simple-minded measurements
always fall short. We hit their uncomfortably low ceilings when testing our intellectual capacities. I think it should be obvious that it takes enormous
perceptive skills to recognize massive complexity in others and average people just aren't up to it. They can't ever be. They're only good and celebrating
things very close to average because they can understand them. Let me go on another rant.
Let's look at the concept of stupidity for a moment. I think stupid people are fascinated by the concept of stupidity because they need to lie to
themselves to think that they are not that stupid. They love to watch America's Funniest Home-Videos or retarded bumbling protagonists on just about every
mainstream show ever syndicated (Married With Children's Al, Simpsons' Homer, Family Guy's Peter, Futurama's Fry, etc. and I'm sure there's a million other
examples but I just don't watch enough TV to come up with better more modern examples at the moment). I'm not saying these shows are all bad. They have a
great deal of humor, wit, and sex appeal. Sometimes they're quite clever or deal with difficult topics (which may fly right over the heads of a substantial
portion of their audience). Average people love MTV's Jackass movies, Backyard Wrestling, COPS, and Darwin Awards. I think most people identify greatly with
stupidity and laziness but then they also want to distance themselves from it too by saying they would never be *that* stupid (when observing the most extreme
examples). I don't think stupidity is all that funny. I think it has always been a cancer. The more people care to learn and pay attention to what's
going on in themselves, in their families and communities, in their state and country, and in the rest of the world and universe around them, the better
everything gets. If average people are so scared of being stupid, why doesn't that motivate them to transcend average? Of course this would only raise the
actual level of "average" so most people couldn't actually transcend it but the desire to improve would generally be able to accelerate with efficiency (as it
should).
So I thought Proof was a great movie in every way except for the ending... which was tawdry. Maybe I'm just jealous that Katie was going to be recognized
as brilliant and I'm not... yet ;) ... or maybe I'm just trying to convince myself that recognition and typical achievement don't matter nearly as much as
everyone makes them out to... but then there's still the obvious truth that influence and progress become monumentally more possible with increased appeal and
attention. I must try to be happy with or without them so I resent the reinforcement that external appreciation is the only right measure of worth.
P.S. A good friend also sent me this sweet link: Free Hugs!